Expedition Exchange Bulletin Boards  

Go Back   Expedition Exchange Bulletin Boards > Technical Discussions
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Old September 3rd, 2008, 06:54 PM
johnlee johnlee is online now
John Lee
K6YJ
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 16,070
Love the clear windows.

The Four Wheeler of the Year stickers have to go though.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old September 3rd, 2008, 07:14 PM
Scott Brady Scott Brady is online now
Scott Brady
KE7PNP
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnlee
The Four Wheeler of the Year stickers have to go though.

Now that it has been modified, I will likely remove them. It was too "correct" before now.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old November 17th, 2008, 11:24 AM
Louis B. Louis B. is offline
Louis Burrows
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 36
Updates?

How is Phase 2 coming along?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old November 17th, 2008, 09:53 PM
Scott Brady Scott Brady is online now
Scott Brady
KE7PNP
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 267
There have been a few changes as of late, all focused on the things not easily seen by others, but immediately noticed by the driver.







I am quite content with the exterior modifications (as shown in the images above), so all of my attention has been on strengthening the drivetrain and enhancing the suspension performance (handling, load capacity, balance, damping).

The next level is to open the axles up and fit a new set of gears, ARB locking differentials, stronger axle shafts, new prop shafts and all new brakes.

I have started to address navigation and communications as well, but fortunately in a reversible way. The Magellan Cross-Over is a small, simple GPS unit that has integrated Topo and street navigation capabilities.


I am also deciding on an amateur radio. The Icom IC-2820H is of interest, with the removable faceplate mounted in the center console (or possibly to the headliner panel, below the dome light).


I will probably end up with an IC-706MKIIG too, but that will be mounted in the EarthRoamer.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old November 18th, 2008, 11:16 AM
johnlee johnlee is online now
John Lee
K6YJ
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 16,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by expeditionswest

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEK!

You're replacing parts that don't break with parts that break.

Those welded radius arms are just asking for trouble. Study the factory radius arms and you'll see that they're made from a single-piece forging. In contrast, the factory trailing arms are made from components welded together. There's a reason Land Rover used a forging for the radius arms. The radius arms are under tremendous force under braking. I've seen a few broken welded radius arms but I've never seen a broken factory radius arm. And there are very few aftermarket radius arms in use and hundreds and hundreds of factory radius arms in use.

Those poly bushings also break. They split catastrophically and you're left with the bolt rattling around inside the hole that the bushing previously occupied. Even worse, the poly bushings break without warning. You can inspect them and they look fine. Then they split without warning. And when they split they are done.

In contrast, the factory rubber bushings don't fail catastrophically. They wear over time and in a predictable manner. When you have a bushing that is going bad, you can tell and you can replace it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by expeditionswest

I'm not sure I understand the reason for this heim for the A-arm. I've never seen a factory A-arm joint break the way heim joints do. Remember, that heim is not sealed against the elements and it's not lubricated. That's not a good combination. It'll start to wear and you'll get that annoying click sound every time you go over a bump. And it may grenade.

Quote:
Originally Posted by expeditionswest

That garage door opener. Dump it. It's ghetto in your Disco. Sure, you have to open the garage. But hide that remote. Take apart the remote and find where the wires from the momentary switch are. Then wire in a factory momentary switch on the binnacle or dash or center console. Hide the remote behind the flap that opens beneath the steering wheel. It's some cool shit to open the garage door with a factory switch.

If that's too much trouble, then put the garage door remote inside the center console. It looks like ass mounted on the visor like that.

Rookie.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old November 18th, 2008, 12:51 PM
Scott Brady Scott Brady is online now
Scott Brady
KE7PNP
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 267
I don't care about the garage remote - I am not that vain. However, I might get the homelink, which is a simple plug-in and solves the problem of needing two remotes (garage and gate).

The front control arms resolved several handling issues that most (through ignorance of suspension dynamics or preference to have a half-dozen unwired lights) leave unattended. Principally caster. These arms also adjust the wheelbase back to factory and also reduce the included angle of the arm, improving directional stability and reducing articulation induced creep steer. I have not found a suitable caster correction solution for the stock arms, so they had to go.

There is no question of the strength of the stock cast arms, but they are far too much of a handling compromise to leave alone. I am not the least bit concerned about the integrity of these new arms or the bushings they utilize. In general, I have not been a fan of polyurethane, mostly due to the inevitable squeak they product (and often actually limit articulation). I use a new silicon grease that has proven to last with minimal maintenance. These arms with the poly bushing do not limit articulation, and will droop past the extension capacity of the OME shock.

The heim pinion angle adjuster is a fully sealed unit with a polished finish and banded wiper seal. The primary function of the heim assembly is to align the pinion and t-case joint angles (prop shaft) to eliminate vibration. I have driven race trucks with smaller heims than that on the suspension, and am not concerned with durability. The pinion angle adjuster entirely eliminated vibration.

The important result for me is that the Disco rides and drives better than stock, both in low-speed technical terrain and at high-speed in the desert. The combination of OME springs, OME shocks, HD steering components, arms and pinion angle adjuster all corrected for and/or improved the handling performance of my Disco.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old November 18th, 2008, 01:40 PM
johnlee johnlee is online now
John Lee
K6YJ
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 16,070
If you want caster correction, Old Man Emu makes caster-correcting bushings with eccentric centers. Normally, these aren't an option for me because I don't want poly bushings. But if you're going to go with poly bushings anyway, then I think swapping bushings makes more sense than swapping arms.

Another option for caster correction is to solve the problem at the swivel balls rather than the arms. Many people with caster-corrected radius arms have experienced increased driveline vibrations because their front pinions are pointing more downward than before. This lower pinion angle combined with the lift usually associated with such vehicles often results in driveline vibes. The front driveshaft is short and it's out of phase from the factory. Most people have had better luck with driveline vibes by leaving the factory radius arms and correcting caster at the swivel balls.

I think an easier solution than either of the above-mentioned solutions is to install a TruTrac front diff. The TT makes the vehicle self-center better than when it was stock. And I get more traction up front and a stronger front diff to boot. To me, this is easier than swallowing a bird to catch the spider, which you swallowed to catch the fly, which you shouldn't have swallowed in the first place.

The rear pinion angle is adjustable without changing the ball joint. Just change the length of the trailing arms. That's what I did. I just installed longer bushing bolts and used washers as shims until I found the length that I wanted. When I ordered a set of trailing arms from Rock Ware, I just told Matt what length I wanted. Now I have the pinion angle I wanted and the factory ball joint is still intact. I figured I was going to order new trailing arms anyway (the factory trailing arms are actually parts that fail and should be replaced), so why not specify a length for my replacement trailing arms.

I think you're confusing drop and flex for the front arms. I don't doubt that the poly-bushed radius arms can drop past the extended length of the OME shocks. However, these arms with poly bushings will not flex the way the factory radius arms with rubber bushings will. The design of the radius arms wants to twist the front axle at full flex. The radius arms are joined to the front axle at fixed points. With one arm pointing up and the other pointing down, the front axle wants to twist. Of course the bushings give more easily than the front axle casing, and they compress before the axle twists. This is what limits front articulation in the Land Rovers. It's also what causes poly bushings to split and fail.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old November 18th, 2008, 02:55 PM
Scott Brady Scott Brady is online now
Scott Brady
KE7PNP
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnlee
If you want caster correction, Old Man Emu makes caster-correcting bushings with eccentric centers. Normally, these aren't an option for me because I don't want poly bushings. But if you're going to go with poly bushings anyway, then I think swapping bushings makes more sense than swapping arms.

They are an option, but not durable enough for my needs. I have witnessed the OME caster correction bushing fail in less than one day of hard use. The nature of their design reduces the bushing material on one side of the bushing and increases it on the other, changing the caster of the axle. Unfortunately, they don't prove reliable.

The swivel ball is certainly an option, but the arms resolved all of my concerns at once.

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnlee
I think an easier solution than either of the above-mentioned solutions is to install a TruTrac front diff. The TT makes the vehicle self-center better than when it was stock. And I get more traction up front and a stronger front diff to boot. To me, this is easier than swallowing a bird to catch the spider, which you swallowed to catch the fly, which you shouldn't have swallowed in the first place.

The TT is certainly a solution for a vehicle limited to desert travel. Its appeal quickly deteriorates anytime snow, ice or slick surfaces are encountered. Understeer is violent and entirely unpredictable on these surfaces.

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnlee
The rear pinion angle is adjustable without changing the ball joint. Just change the length of the trailing arms. That's what I did. I just installed longer bushing bolts and used washers as shims until I found the length that I wanted. When I ordered a set of trailing arms from Rock Ware, I just told Matt what length I wanted. Now I have the pinion angle I wanted and the factory ball joint is still intact. I figured I was going to order new trailing arms anyway (the factory trailing arms are actually parts that fail and should be replaced), so why not specify a length for my replacement trailing arms.

Great solution for your application. I wanted complete adjustability, as my goal is to retain the rotoflex, which actually requires the pinion and prop-shaft to be at the same angle. If the rotoflex and a skid-plate proves unreliable, I will switch to a new driveshaft with a u-joint, in which case both the pinion and t-case angles will need to be the same to eliminate vibration.

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnlee
I think you're confusing drop and flex for the front arms.

Based on my configuration, both crossed-axle articulation and maximum suspension extension are limited by the OME (N115) shock with the Inland Rover arms. With the front shock unbolted, crossed-axle articulation will drop another 1 1/4" before ultimate bind of the bushing in the arm cradle bracket.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old November 18th, 2008, 04:19 PM
johnlee johnlee is online now
John Lee
K6YJ
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 16,070
Yeah, those caster-correcting bushings are shit. Even the concentric poly bushings are shit. They will fail you. It's not if. It's when. Fortunately, the poly bushings are easier to swap out in the field than the factory bushings.

The TT definitely has disadvantages. But I like it because it's the least intrusive method of solve the caster problem. I get oversteer on slick roads. When driving on city streets, the speeds are slow enough that I don't even notice it. The time I notice the oversteer at all is on those long freeway interchanges. But I've been driving with the TT for so long that I really don't notice it. For me, it's just the way my truck drives. I once got really drunk at a friend's wedding and my brother had to drive me home in my D90. He said he could barely drive it. He kept thinking the truck was going to flip over. I thought the same thing when I first drove my Disco.

When you tested the front flex and how it was limited by the length of the shock, was the vehicle in the driveway with the opposite front wheel on the ground? I'm guessing yes. If the opposite front wheel is tucked hard and that corner's shock and spring are compressed (the way they would be in most cross-axled situations), then I think you'll reach the binding point on the front suspension before you reach the maximum length of the extended shock on the opposite front corner.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old November 19th, 2008, 05:04 AM
dchapman dchapman is offline
Daniel Chapman
KJ4BXR
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 1,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnlee
this is easier than swallowing a bird to catch the spider

That's funny.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnlee
I once got really drunk at a friend's wedding and my brother had to drive me home

That's even funnier.

Quote:
Originally Posted by expeditionswest
my goal is to retain the rotoflex

What?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnlee
When you tested the front flex and how it was limited by the length of the shock, was the vehicle in the driveway with the opposite front wheel on the ground? I'm guessing yes. If the opposite front wheel is tucked hard and that corner's shock and spring are compressed (the way they would be in most cross-axled situations), then I think you'll reach the binding point on the front suspension before you reach the maximum length of the extended shock on the opposite front corner.

What I've found is that with the RTE front links designed to be used with a 3" lift, you'll gain a little more drop in the front axle when jack stands are under the frame and the axle is hanging. The axle will drop just over an inch farther than the OME N115 shocks length.

But when one front wheel is tucked and the truck is actually articulating, you do not get the same measurements. When articulating to the point of a rear wheel coming off the ground, the OME N115's still have about 3/4" of travel left. Unless you're jumping your truck I think the N115's are fine in the front.

However, from what I've found, the OME N44 rear shocks seem to be a tad short for a 3" lift. I've seen some people run them forever, while others pull them apart.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old July 6th, 2016, 06:14 PM
hks3sgte hks3sgte is offline
Cesar Gomez
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,086
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old July 6th, 2016, 09:35 PM
Scott Brady Scott Brady is online now
Scott Brady
KE7PNP
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 267
It sold this morning.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old July 7th, 2016, 07:40 AM
traveltoad traveltoad is offline
Aaron Shrier
KI6BCA
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Fernando Valley
Posts: 2,625
That was fast.
____________________
2003 Discovery
2007 KTM 950R Super Enduro
2010 KTM 250XC-W
2016 SoulCraft Dirtbomb
2016 FoundryOverland

You only lost went running out o gas ,the rest is exploring Javier

Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old July 7th, 2016, 12:32 PM
johnlee johnlee is online now
John Lee
K6YJ
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 16,070
I still think Scott should have sold that Disco for like $50,000 to some ExPoer who was dying for a piece of Scott's table scraps.

We'll see if whoever buys that Disco tints the windows.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old July 12th, 2016, 11:36 AM
hks3sgte hks3sgte is offline
Cesar Gomez
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,086
Sold for $16k.

Rob needs to get his D1 ExPo ready.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old July 12th, 2016, 02:57 PM
JimmyKelly JimmyKelly is offline
Jimmy Kelly
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by hks3sgte
Sold for $16k.

Rob needs to get his D1 ExPo ready.

I already told him to paint it white.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old July 13th, 2016, 02:04 PM
Scott Brady Scott Brady is online now
Scott Brady
KE7PNP
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 267
I sold a vehicle I rarely drove and bought a watch I will wear daily.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old July 13th, 2016, 03:51 PM
Mike_Rupp Mike_Rupp is offline
Mike Rupp
WZ7V
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mercer Island, WA
Posts: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Brady
I sold a vehicle I rarely drove and bought a watch I will wear daily.

Do tell.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old July 13th, 2016, 05:12 PM
Scott Brady Scott Brady is online now
Scott Brady
KE7PNP
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 267
16710 GMT
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old July 13th, 2016, 05:29 PM
hks3sgte hks3sgte is offline
Cesar Gomez
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,086
Nice. No Jubilee, right?
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old July 13th, 2016, 07:10 PM
Scott Brady Scott Brady is online now
Scott Brady
KE7PNP
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by hks3sgte
Nice. No Jubilee, right?

No Jubilee. Black bezel.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old July 14th, 2016, 04:16 AM
ronward ronward is offline
KI4WWU
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 738
Nice!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg GMT 16710.JPG (115.5 KB, 18 views)
____________________
Ron Ward
1990 Range Rover Classic
& a couple nice watches

Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old July 14th, 2016, 08:01 AM
Mike_Rupp Mike_Rupp is offline
Mike Rupp
WZ7V
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mercer Island, WA
Posts: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Brady
16710 GMT

Nice. I love the GMT when I see it on someone else's wrist. Then I try it on and it just looks wrong on me. It pisses me off.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old July 14th, 2016, 11:19 AM
hks3sgte hks3sgte is offline
Cesar Gomez
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike_Rupp
Nice. I love the GMT when I see it on someone else's wrist. Then I try it on and it just looks wrong on me. It pisses me off.

It does wear a bit small especially for people with larger wrists.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old July 14th, 2016, 11:31 AM
johnlee johnlee is online now
John Lee
K6YJ
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 16,070
I think the reason the GMT looks small is because we're also accustomed to seeing Submariners. The GMT isn't really a small watch. The GMT is bigger than the Datejust and the Datejust looks just fine. But the GMT (especially the black GMT) looks small because we can't help but compare it to the Sub.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT Series III Project CEM3 General 0 July 10th, 2006 09:24 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:24 PM.




Copyright 2001-2012 Expedition Exchange Incorporated. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.